Indian Polity

Directive Principles of State Policy

50,000+ Questions

Previous Year Papers

Detailed Solutions

Hindi & English

MEDIUM

What was the direct constitutional implication of the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act (1971)?

It stripped the Supreme Court of all Judicial Review powers.

It empowered Parliament to amend or curtail Fundamental Rights through a Constitutional Amendment Act.

It introduced Article 31(C) giving priority to socialist Directive Principles.

It added 44 new acts to the Ninth Schedule.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is It empowered Parliament to amend or curtail Fundamental Rights through a Constitutional Amendment Act.
Core Concept: 24th Constitutional Amendment Act (1971) powers.

🧠 Solution Blueprint

The 24th Constitutional Amendment Act (1971) was enacted to overcome the Golaknath ruling, explicitly empowering Parliament with the authority to amend, modify, or curtail any Fundamental Rights through a constitutional amendment.

EASY

Which Article of the Constitution mandates the protection of monuments, places, and objects of national importance against spoliation, disfigurement, destruction, removal, disposal, or export?

Article 48

Article 48(A)

Article 49

Article 50

Explanation

Article 49 specifically mandates the protection of monuments, places, and objects of artistic or historic interest declared to be of national importance against spoliation, disfigurement, destruction, removal, disposal, or export.

MEDIUM

Consider the following statements regarding the definition of 'State' under Article 36 of the Indian Constitution:

It includes the Legislature and Executive of the Union government.
It includes the Legislature and Executive of the respective States.
It excludes Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and entities funded by the State treasury.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 only

1 and 2 only

2 and 3 only

1, 2 and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1 and 2 only.
Core Concept: The definition of 'State' under Article 36 comprehensively covers the central and state governments' legislative and executive organs along with public undertakings.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Statement Analysis:
- Statement 1 is correct: The Legislature and Executive of the Union (Central Government) form part of the definition.
- Statement 2 is correct: The Legislature and Executive of the States are also included.
- Statement 3 is incorrect: Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and entities funded by the State treasury are included under 'Other Authorities', not excluded.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Entity Category	Inclusion Status under Article 36	Governance Sphere
Union Legislature & Executive	Included	Central Government
State Legislature & Executive	Included	State Governments
Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)	Included ('Other Authorities')	State-funded Enterprises

HARD

Consider the following statements regarding the orientation of Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy:

Fundamental Rights are described as negative in nature because they prohibit the State from performing certain actions against individuals.
Directive Principles of State Policy are described as positive in nature because they command the State to undertake specific actions for public welfare.
Violation of Directive Principles can be legally challenged in a court of law just like Fundamental Rights.

Which of the statements given above is/are incorrect?

1 only

3 only

2 and 3 only

1 and 2 only

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The incorrect statement is 3 only.
Core Concept: Justiciability separates FRs from DPSPs.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Statement 1: Correct. Fundamental Rights are negative in nature (Nakaratmak Prakriti) as they impose limitations on state actions.
Statement 2: Correct. Directive Principles are positive in nature (Sakaratmak Prakriti) as they direct the state to work actively for welfare.
Statement 3: Incorrect. Directive Principles are non-justiciable, meaning their violation cannot be challenged in court, whereas Fundamental Rights are justiciable (Nyayalay dwara pravartaniya).

MEDIUM

Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding the nature and enforceability of Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy?

Fundamental Rights are justiciable, meaning their violation can be challenged in a court of law.

Directive Principles of State Policy promote Social and Economic Democracy.

Fundamental Rights are positive in nature because they command the State to undertake welfare measures.

Directive Principles of State Policy are non-justiciable and cannot be enforced by courts.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The incorrect statement is Fundamental Rights are positive in nature because they command the State to undertake welfare measures.
Core Concept: Fundamental Rights are negative in nature, while Directive Principles are positive in nature.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Correcting the Statement: Fundamental Rights are actually negative in nature (Nakaratmak Prakriti) because they prohibit the State from restricting individual freedoms. It is the Directive Principles of State Policy that are positive in nature (Sakaratmak Prakriti) because they command the State to perform proactive actions for public welfare.

No credit card required

HARD

Consider the following Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option:

Assertion (A): In the Minerva Mills Case (1980), the Supreme Court declared the expansion of Article 31(C) introduced by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment unconstitutional.
Reason (R): The Court observed that a harmonious balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles constitutes an essential part of the Basic Structure of the Indian Constitution.

Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true, but (R) is false

(A) is false, but (R) is true

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
Core Concept: Minerva Mills Case and the Basic Structure doctrine regarding Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.

🧠 Solution Blueprint

Assertion Verification: The Supreme Court in the Minerva Mills Case (1980) indeed struck down the 42nd Amendment's extension of Article 31(C) which had given supremacy to all Directive Principles over Articles 14, 19, and 31.
Reason Verification: The core reasoning behind striking it down was that giving absolute overriding power to all directive principles would destroy the harmonious balance between FRs and DPSPs, which is a core pillar of the Basic Structure of the Constitution.

EASY

According to the legal classifications provided in the context, which of the following disputes is strictly categorized under Civil Law (Naagrik Kanoon) rather than Criminal Law?

Murder and homicide

Armed robbery and looting

Marriage, divorce, and property disputes

Theft of public property

Explanation

Civil Law deals with disputes related to private rights, such as marriage (Vivah), divorce (Talaq), and property (Sampatti) disputes between individuals. Murder, robbery, looting, and theft fall strictly under Criminal Law (Apraadhik Kanoon).

MEDIUM

Match the following landmark judicial cases with their respective rulings or doctrines regarding Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles:

Case	Ruling / Doctrine
A. Champakam Dorairajan Case (1951)	1. Introduced the Doctrine of Harmony and Balance
B. Kerala Education Bill Case (1958)	2. Ruled that Fundamental Rights prevail over Directive Principles
C. Golaknath Case (1967)	3. Declared that the balance between FR and DPSP forms part of the Basic Structure
D. Minerva Mills Case (1980)	4. Held that Parliament cannot abridge Fundamental Rights to implement DPSP

Select the correct code from the options below:

A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3

A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4

A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4

A-4, B-2, C-3, D-1

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct matching is A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3.
Core Concept: Core contributions of historical Supreme Court rulings balancing Part III and Part IV of the Constitution.

🧠 Solution Blueprint

Champakam Dorairajan Case (1951) established that Fundamental Rights prevail over Directive Principles in case of conflict.
Kerala Education Bill Case (1958) formulated the Doctrine of Harmony and Balance to interpret provisions avoiding direct conflict.
Golaknath Case (1967) ruled that Parliament cannot abridge Fundamental Rights specifically to implement Directive Principles.
Minerva Mills Case (1980) affirmed that the balance between FR and DPSP forms part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution.

EASY

Which part or feature of the Indian constitutional framework is specifically credited with promoting Social and Economic Democracy (Samajik, Aarthik Loktantra)?

Fundamental Rights

Directive Principles of State Policy

Preamble's declaration of Republic

Emergency Provisions

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is Directive Principles of State Policy.
Core Concept: Constitutional goals are divided between political democracy (via FR) and socio-economic democracy (via DPSP).

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Directive Principles (DPSP): Promote Social and Economic Democracy (Samajik, Aarthik Loktantra) by guiding the state toward equitable resource distribution and social welfare.
Fundamental Rights: Promote Political Democracy (Rajnitik Loktantra) by securing civil liberties and political freedoms against state encroachment.

MEDIUM

Which of the following Directive Principles is NOT classified under Gandhian Principles?

Organization of Village Panchayats (Article 40)

Promotion of Cooperative Societies (Article 43B)

Separation of Judiciary from Executive (Article 50)

Prohibition of intoxicating drinks and drugs (Article 47)

Explanation

The correct answer is Separation of Judiciary from Executive (Article 50).

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: Article 50 belongs to the Liberal-Intellectual Principles, not Gandhian principles.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Gandhian Options: Article 40 (Village Panchayats), Article 43(B) (Cooperatives), and Article 47 (Prohibition of intoxicants) all embody Mahatma Gandhi's ideals of village self-reliance and moral upliftment.
Liberal-Intellectual Option: Article 50 aims at institutional governance by ensuring the independence and separation of the judiciary from the executive.

Full Mock Tests

Take Full-Length Mock Tests

Test your complete preparation with timed mock tests. Get detailed analytics and compare scores with other aspirants.

Explore Test Series

MEDIUM

Institutions such as NALSA, RAJLSA, and DILSA operate at various administrative levels to implement which of the following constitutional provisions?

Organization of Village Panchayats under Article 40

Equal Justice and Free Legal Aid under Article 39(A)

Uniform Civil Code under Article 44

Participation of workers in management under Article 43(A)

Explanation

The National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority (RAJLSA), and District Legal Services Authority (DILSA) are specialized statutory bodies established to provide free legal aid and ensure equal justice pursuant to Article 39(A).

MEDIUM

Consider the following statements regarding Articles 47, 48, 49, and 50 of the Constitution:

Article 47 mandates the State to raise the level of nutrition, improve public health, and endeavor to prohibit intoxicating drinks and drugs.
Article 49 mandates the protection of monuments, places, and objects of national importance against spoliation and destruction.
Article 50 directs the separation of the Judiciary from the Executive in public services of the State.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 and 2 only

2 and 3 only

1 and 3 only

1, 2 and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1, 2 and 3.
Core Concept: [Remaining Directives] Public health, historical preservation, and judicial independence under Part IV.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The Core Entity: Articles 47 to 50:
- Statement 1 is correct: Article 47 focuses on raising nutrition standards, public health, and prohibition of harmful drugs.
- Statement 2 is correct: Article 49 protects historical and artistic national monuments.
- Statement 3 is correct: Article 50 ensures the institutional separation of Judiciary from Executive.

MEDIUM

Consider the following comparative characteristics of Fundamental Rights (FR) and Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP):

Fundamental Rights promote Political Democracy, whereas Directive Principles promote Social and Economic Democracy.
Fundamental Rights are individualistic in nature, whereas Directive Principles are social and community-oriented in nature.
Fundamental Rights require separate legislative enactment by the State for implementation, whereas Directive Principles are implemented immediately with the commencement of the Constitution.

1 and 2 only

2 and 3 only

1 and 3 only

1, 2 and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1 and 2 only.
Core Concept: [FR vs DPSP Comparison] Structural and philosophical differences between Part III and Part IV of the Constitution.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The Core Entity: Comparative Framework:
- Statement 1 is correct: FRs establish political democracy while DPSPs establish socio-economic democracy.
- Statement 2 is correct: FRs protect individual liberties (individualistic), whereas DPSPs foster community welfare (social-oriented).
- Statement 3 is incorrect: Fundamental Rights were enforceable immediately upon the commencement of the Constitution without needing separate laws, whereas DPSPs require the State to enact specific legislation (Vidhi Nirman) for their enforcement.

MEDIUM

Match the following Articles of the Directive Principles of State Policy with their respective philosophical classifications:

Article	Classification / Subject
A. Article 43(B)	1. Liberal-Intellectual: Separation of Judiciary from Executive
B. Article 47	2. Gandhian: Promotion of Cooperative Societies
C. Article 49	3. Gandhian: Prohibition of intoxicating drinks and drugs
D. Article 50	4. Liberal-Intellectual: Protection of monuments and places of national importance

Select the correct code from the options below:

A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1

A-1, B-3, C-2, D-4

A-2, B-4, C-3, D-1

A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4

Explanation

The correct answer is A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1.

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: Article 43(B) relates to Cooperative Societies (Gandhian), Article 47 to prohibition of intoxicants (Gandhian), Article 49 to national monuments (Liberal-Intellectual), and Article 50 to the separation of Judiciary from Executive (Liberal-Intellectual).

🧠 Solution Blueprint

Article 43(B) was added by the 97th Constitutional Amendment Act and is part of Gandhian Principles promoting voluntary formation and autonomous functioning of cooperative societies.
Article 47 mandates the prohibition of intoxicating drinks and drugs which are injurious to health (Gandhian Principle).
Article 49 obligates the state to protect every monument or place of artistic or historic interest (Liberal-Intellectual Principle).
Article 50 provides for the separation of the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the State (Liberal-Intellectual Principle).

HARD

Assertion (A): The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 expanded Article 31(C) to give precedence to all Directive Principles over Fundamental Rights under Articles 14, 19, and 31.
Reason (R): In the landmark Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court upheld this expanded scope of Article 31(C) as a core feature of the Basic Structure of the Constitution.

Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true, but (R) is false

(A) is false, but (R) is true

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is (A) is true, but (R) is false.
Core Concept: [FR vs DPSP Judicial Review] The evolution of Article 31(C) and its judicial curtailment in the Minerva Mills case.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The Core Entity: Article 31(C) and Minerva Mills Case (1980):
- The 25th Amendment initially protected laws implementing Article 39(b) and (c) from being challenged under Articles 14, 19, and 31.
- The 42nd Amendment (1976) extended this protection to any Directive Principle.
Why It is Correct: [Reasoning Step-by-Step]:
- Assertion (A) is true because the 42nd Amendment indeed expanded Article 31(C) to cover all DPSPs.
- Reason (R) is false because the Supreme Court in the Minerva Mills case (1980) struck down this expansion as unconstitutional, ruling that total supremacy of DPSP over Fundamental Rights destroys the harmonious balance which is part of the Basic Structure.

EASY

Which of the following Articles of the Directive Principles of State Policy provides for the separation of the Judiciary from the Executive in the public services of the State?

Article 48

Article 49

Article 50

Article 51

Explanation

Article 50 explicitly provides for the separation of the Judiciary from the Executive in the public services of the State to ensure judicial independence.

HARD

Match the following Constitutional Amendment Acts with their primary legislative focus or impact:

Constitutional Amendment Act	Primary Focus / Provision
A. 1st Amendment Act (1951)	1. Empowered Parliament to amend Fundamental Rights
B. 4th Amendment Act (1955)	2. Introduced Articles 31A, 31B and the Ninth Schedule
C. 17th Amendment Act (1964)	3. Enabled nationalization of private businesses and restricted compensation challenges
D. 24th Amendment Act (1971)	4. Added 44 acts to Ninth Schedule and mandated adequate compensation for agricultural land

Select the correct code from the options below:

A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1

A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4

A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3

A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct matching is A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1.
Core Concept: Summary of key constitutional amendments addressing property and Fundamental Rights.

🧠 Solution Blueprint

1st Amendment (1951) introduced Articles 31A, 31B and the Ninth Schedule.
4th Amendment (1955) enabled the nationalization of private businesses and restricted court challenges on compensation.
17th Amendment (1964) added 44 acts to the Ninth Schedule and required adequate agricultural land compensation.
24th Amendment (1971) empowered Parliament to amend Fundamental Rights.

MEDIUM

Which Constitutional Amendment Act added 44 new acts to the Ninth Schedule and stipulated that if the government acquires agricultural land, it must provide adequate compensation?

1st Constitutional Amendment Act (1951)

4th Constitutional Amendment Act (1955)

17th Constitutional Amendment Act (1964)

24th Constitutional Amendment Act (1971)

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 17th Constitutional Amendment Act (1964).
Core Concept: 17th Constitutional Amendment Act provisions regarding Ninth Schedule additions and agricultural land compensation.

🧠 Solution Blueprint

The 17th Constitutional Amendment Act (1964) added 44 new acts to the Ninth Schedule to shield them from judicial review and specifically stipulated that adequate compensation must be paid if the state acquires agricultural land.

HARD

Consider the following statements regarding key Constitutional Amendment Acts concerning Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles:

The 1st Constitutional Amendment Act (1951) introduced Articles 31A and 31B along with the Ninth Schedule to protect social welfare legislation from judicial review.
The 25th Constitutional Amendment Act (1971) introduced Article 31(C), ensuring that laws implementing Directive Principles under Articles 39(b) and 39(c) cannot be declared invalid for violating Articles 14, 19, or 31.
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act (1976) restricted the scope of Article 31(C) so that it applied only to agricultural land reforms.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 and 2 only

2 and 3 only

1 and 3 only

1, 2 and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1 and 2 only.
Core Concept: Constitutional amendments modifying the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.

🧠 Solution Blueprint

Statement 1 Analysis: The 1st Constitutional Amendment Act (1951) indeed introduced Articles 31A and 31B and created the Ninth Schedule to shield agrarian and social welfare laws from judicial review.
Statement 2 Analysis: The 25th Constitutional Amendment Act (1971) added Article 31(C), giving protection to legislation enacted to implement Directive Principles under Article 39(b) and 39(c).
Statement 3 Analysis: The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act (1976) expanded (not restricted) the scope of Article 31(C) to cover any Directive Principle, an expansion that was later struck down in the Minerva Mills case.

MEDIUM

Consider the following statements regarding Article 37 of the Indian Constitution:

It specifies the nature and application of the Directive Principles of State Policy.
It establishes that DPSP are legally enforceable by the Supreme Court in case of violation.
It mandates that DPSP are fundamental in the governance of the country.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 and 2 only

1 and 3 only

2 and 3 only

1, 2 and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1 and 3 only.
Core Concept: Article 37 balances the non-enforceability of DPSP with their fundamental role as guiding lights in national governance.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Statement Analysis:
- Statement 1 is correct: Article 37 explicitly lays down the nature and application of Directive Principles.
- Statement 2 is incorrect: DPSP are explicitly non-justiciable and cannot be enforced by the Supreme Court or any other court.
- Statement 3 is correct: Even though courts cannot compel implementation, the principles are declared fundamental in the governance of the country.

Free Forever

Track Your Progress

You're Doing Great! 🎯

Sign up free to unlock unlimited questions, save your progress, and access all Directive Principles of State Policy questions.

Unlimited PYQs Progress Tracking Mock Tests

✨ Free forever • No credit card • 2 sec signup with Google

Full Mock Tests

Take Full-Length Mock Tests

Test your complete preparation with timed mock tests. Get detailed analytics and compare scores with other aspirants.

Explore Test Series

All Chapters

Indian Polity

Salient Features of Constitution

55+ questions

Making of Constitution

132+ questions

Preamble & Schedules

222+ questions

Union & Its Territories

86+ questions

Fundamental Rights

282+ questions

Directive Principles of State Policy

Centre-State Relations

264+ questions

Constitutional Amendments

Important Commissions

121+ questions

Socio-Political Dynamics

100+ questions

Political Parties

135+ questions

Civil Society & Movements

187+ questions

Local Self-Government

186+ questions