Indian Polity

Union & Its Territories

50,000+ Questions

Previous Year Papers

Detailed Solutions

Hindi & English

MEDIUM

Which of the following is true regarding the role of the President in a bill for the formation of a new state?

The President can veto the bill after it is passed by Parliament.

The President must return the bill to Parliament at least once for reconsideration.

The President can neither return the bill for reconsideration nor withhold assent once it is passed.

The President acts only after the state legislature has passed a resolution supporting the bill.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is The President can neither return the bill for reconsideration nor withhold assent once it is passed.
Core Concept: The President's involvement is primarily at the initiation stage (prior recommendation), not the final approval stage.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Presidential Role: Since the bill is introduced with the prior recommendation of the President, it is implied that the head of the executive has already consented to the proposal.
Limitation: The power to return bills for reconsideration (Suspensive Veto) does not apply to this process, ensuring that the legislative intent of the Parliament regarding state reorganization remains unimpeded.

MEDIUM

Consider the following statements regarding the powers of the Parliament under Articles 2 and 3 of the Indian Constitution:

Article 2 empowers the Parliament to admit or establish new states that were not part of India before.
Article 3 empowers the Parliament to alter the boundaries or names of existing Indian states.
Changes made under Article 2 or 3 are considered Constitutional Amendments under Article 368.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 and 2 only

2 and 3 only

1 and 3 only

1, 2, and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1 and 2 only.
Core Concept: Article 2 and Article 3 provide the Parliament with the power to reorganize the territory of India, but these changes explicitly do not require a Constitutional Amendment under Article 368.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Article 2 vs. Article 3:
- Article 2: Focuses on external territories (admission of new states not currently in India).
- Article 3: Focuses on internal reorganization (forming new states from existing ones, altering borders, or renaming).
Why Statement 3 is Incorrect: The Constitution explicitly states in Article 4 that laws made under Articles 2 and 3 to change the 1st and 4th schedules are not considered constitutional amendments under Article 368. This allows such changes to be passed by a Simple Majority.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Article	Focus Area	Requirement	Amendment Status
Article 2	External States	Admitting new territory	Not Art 368
Article 3	Internal States	Altering/Uniting states	Not Art 368
Article 368	Constitutional Amendment	Special Majority	Changes basic structure

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Common Pitfall: Students often confuse the simple majority process of internal reorganization with the rigid process of constitutional amendment. Remember that modifying states is a legislative act, not a constitutional one.

HARD

Consider the following assertion and reasoning regarding the Indian Constitution:

Assertion (A): India is described as an 'indestructible Union of destructible states'.
Reason (R): In the Indian system, the country of India created the states, rather than the states creating the country via an agreement.

Which of the following is correct?

Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true, but (R) is false

(A) is false, but (R) is true

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
Core Concept: Indestructible Union of Destructible States.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Assertion Explained: Unlike the USA, where states are sovereign and permanent, Indian states can be reorganized (boundaries changed, states created/merged) by the Parliament. Thus, the states are 'destructible', but the Union itself is 'indestructible'.
Reasoning Explained: The American system is a product of an agreement between sovereign states. In India, there was no such agreement; the unified country pre-existed and created administrative units (states) for governance.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Feature	Indian System (Union)	American System (Federal)
Origin	Created by Center	Formed by Agreement
State Power	Administrative Units	Sovereign Entities
Alteration	Parliament can modify	Constitutionally Protected

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Note

Memorable Trivia: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar highlighted that India acts as a 'Federal' system in peacetime but shifts to a 'Union' system during emergencies.

MEDIUM

Assertion (A): The 14th Constitutional Amendment Act (1962) is significant for the administrative reorganization of former French territories in India.
Reason (R): It resulted in the merger of Chandannagar with West Bengal and established Puducherry, Yanam, Karaikal, and Mahe as Union Territories.

Select the correct option:

Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A

Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A

A is true but R is false

A is false but R is true

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
Core Concept: Impact of the 14th Constitutional Amendment Act.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Assertion: The 14th Amendment was indeed the vehicle for the legal integration of former French possessions.
Reasoning: The mechanism of this integration involved a binary outcome: Chandannagar was absorbed into a state (West Bengal), while others became UTs. This justifies the assertion regarding the significance of the act in administrative reorganization.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Feature	Detail
Amendment	14th Amendment (1962)
French Territories Merged	Chandannagar (into West Bengal)
French Territories as UT	Puducherry, Yanam, Karaikal, Mahe

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Concept Note: Constitutional Amendments in the early 1960s were largely dedicated to providing legal cover to the integration of newly liberated foreign enclaves.

MEDIUM

Arrange the following state formations in chronological order:

Nagaland
Haryana
Sikkim
Himachal Pradesh (Full State)

1 - 2 - 4 - 3

1 - 2 - 3 - 4

2 - 1 - 4 - 3

1 - 4 - 2 - 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: 1 - 2 - 4 - 3.
Core Concept: Chronology of statehood acquisition.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Timeline:
- Nagaland: 1963
- Haryana: 1966 (Punjab bifurcation)
- Himachal Pradesh: 1971 (Granted full state status)
- Sikkim: 1975 (Integrated into India)

📊 Fact Spotlight

State	Status Grant Year
Nagaland	1963
Haryana	1966
Himachal Pradesh	1971
Sikkim	1975

No credit card required

EASY

Which of the following statements is INCORRECT regarding the reorganization of Jammu & Kashmir in 2019?

It was reorganized into two separate entities.

The two entities created were Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh.

The reorganization resulted in the loss of state status for the region.

Ladakh was formed as a State, while J&K was formed as a Union Territory.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: Ladakh was formed as a State, while J&K was formed as a Union Territory.
Core Concept: The 2019 J&K Reorganization.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Correction: In the 2019 reorganization, both Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh were designated as Union Territories, not States.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Entity	Status Post-2019
Jammu & Kashmir	Union Territory
Ladakh	Union Territory

HARD

Assertion (A): The 22nd Constitutional Amendment Act granted Meghalaya the status of a sub-state (Upsahrajya) within Assam.
Reason (R): Meghalaya was carved out of Assam and directly became a full state in 1963, bypassing the sub-state phase.

Which of the following is correct?

Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

A is true, but R is false.

A is false, but R is true.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: A is true, but R is false.
Core Concept: The transitional status of Meghalaya.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Reasoning: The 22nd Amendment indeed granted sub-state status. However, the reason is false because Meghalaya did not become a full state in 1963; it became a full state in 1972.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Event	Year	Context
22nd Amendment	-	Sub-state status for Meghalaya
Meghalaya Statehood	1972	Full state status attained
Nagaland Statehood	1963	Full state status attained

HARD

Arrange the following renaming events in chronological order from the earliest to the most recent:

Mysore to Karnataka
United Provinces to Uttar Pradesh
Pondicherry to Puducherry
Orissa to Odisha

2, 1, 3, 4

2, 1, 4, 3

1, 2, 3, 4

1, 2, 4, 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: 2, 1, 3, 4 (2->1950, 1->1973, 3->2006, 4->2011).
Core Concept: Historical sequence.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Sequence Details:
- 1950: United Provinces -> Uttar Pradesh
- 1973: Mysore -> Karnataka
- 2006: Pondicherry -> Puducherry
- 2011: Orissa -> Odisha

📊 Fact Spotlight

Order	Event	Year
1	UP Rename	1950
2	Karnataka Rename	1973
3	Puducherry Rename	2006
4	Odisha Rename	2011

MEDIUM

Consider the following assertion and reasoning regarding the integration of Sikkim.

Assertion (A): Sikkim became a full-fledged state of the Indian Union through the 36th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975.
Reason (R): Article 2A and the 10th Schedule were removed from the Constitution upon the full integration of Sikkim as a state.

Select the correct code from the options below:

Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

A is true, but R is false.

A is false, but R is true.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
Core Concept: The 36th Constitutional Amendment (1975) was the instrument that converted the Associate status to Full Statehood, necessitating the removal of the previous temporary arrangements (Article 2A).

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Reasoning: The 35th Amendment was a provisional arrangement. When the state was fully integrated, those provisional articles were no longer valid. Thus, the removal of Article 2A and the 10th Schedule was a direct legal consequence of the 36th Amendment.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Common Pitfall: Do not confuse the 10th Schedule in the context of Sikkim (which related to associate status) with the modern 10th Schedule of the Constitution related to Anti-Defection Law.

HARD

Consider the following statements regarding the 1969 Supreme Court ruling on border disputes:

The Court ruled that no Indian territory can be ceded without a constitutional amendment.
General border disputes can be resolved by executive/cabinet decisions if no territory is ceded.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 only

2 only

Both 1 and 2

Neither 1 nor 2

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 2 only.
Core Concept: The 1969 ruling clarified the limits of executive power in territorial matters.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The Distinction: Statement 1 is incorrect in the context of the 1969 ruling because the Berubari case (1960) established the rule about ceding territory; the 1969 ruling specifically clarified that general border disputes do not necessarily require such an amendment if no territory is lost.
Executive Power: If the border is simply being identified or demarcated (not moved to reduce Indian land), the Cabinet/Executive has the authority to finalize it without legislative intervention.

Full Mock Tests

Take Full-Length Mock Tests

Test your complete preparation with timed mock tests. Get detailed analytics and compare scores with other aspirants.

Explore Test Series

MEDIUM

Consider the following statements regarding the 35th and 36th Constitutional Amendment Acts related to Sikkim:

The 35th Amendment (1974) introduced Article 2A and the 10th Schedule to the Constitution.
Under the 35th Amendment, Sikkim was granted the status of an 'Associate State' and gained full voting rights in the Presidential elections.
The 36th Amendment (1975) repealed Article 2A and omitted the 10th Schedule upon Sikkim's full integration.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 and 2 only

2 and 3 only

1 and 3 only

1, 2, and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1 and 3 only.
Core Concept: Constitutional evolution of Sikkim.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Associate State Limitations: While the 35th Amendment (1974) indeed provided Associate State status via Article 2A and the 10th Schedule, Sikkim's representatives were ineligible to participate in Presidential elections during this phase.
Transition: The 36th Amendment (1975) removed the temporary Associate State provisions (Article 2A/10th Schedule) and integrated Sikkim as a full state, making the 1st and 3rd statements correct.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Feature	35th Amendment (1974)	36th Amendment (1975)
Sikkim Status	Associate State	Full State
Key Articles	Added 2A	Repealed 2A
Schedules	Added 10th	Omitted 10th

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Exam Trap: Always remember that 'Associate State' was a temporary, transitional status. Full rights like participating in Presidential elections were only granted post-1975.

MEDIUM

Which of the following best describes the status of Indian states in the context of the Union?

They are sovereign entities formed by an agreement.

They are administrative units that can be altered by the Center.

They have the right to secede from the Union under specific conditions.

They are more powerful than the Union in matters of defense.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: They are administrative units that can be altered by the Center.
Core Concept: Destructibility of States.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Constitutional Power: Under Article 3 (related to the nature of the Union), the Parliament has the power to reorganize states (redrawing boundaries, renaming, or splitting).
Contrast: In a true Federal system (like the USA), state boundaries are generally permanent and protected against arbitrary change by the Center.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Key Difference: In the Indian context, the Union is 'indestructible' (cannot be broken), but the states are 'destructible' (boundaries can change).

MEDIUM

Match the following Indian states/regions with the years their names were officially changed:

Old/Original Name	Year of Renaming
A. Orissa	1. 1969
B. Madras	2. 2006
C. Uttaranchal	3. 2011
D. Pondicherry	4. 2006

Select the correct code from the options below:

A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4

A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2

A-1, B-3, C-2, D-4

A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
Core Concept: Chronology of state name changes.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Timeline Breakdown:
- Orissa became Odisha in 2011.
- Madras became Tamil Nadu in 1969.
- Uttaranchal became Uttarakhand in 2006.
- Pondicherry became Puducherry in 2006.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Event	Old Name	New Name	Year
State Rename	Orissa	Odisha	2011
State Rename	Mysore	Karnataka	1973
UT Rename	Pondicherry	Puducherry	2006

MEDIUM

Match the following historical events/state formations with their respective years:

Event	Year
A. Formation of Andhra State (Linguistic)	1. 1963
B. Formation of Nagaland	2. 1953
C. Formation of Meghalaya	3. 1971
D. Statehood for Himachal Pradesh	4. 1972

Select the correct code:

A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3

A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1

A-1, B-2, C-4, D-3

A-2, B-1, C-3, D-4

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3.
Core Concept: Chronology of Indian state formation.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Andhra State (1953): First linguistic state, formed after the movement led by Potti Sriramulu.
Nagaland (1963): Elevated to state status after reorganization efforts in the Northeast.
Meghalaya (1972): Previously a sub-state (via 22nd Amendment), it became a full state in 1972.
Himachal Pradesh (1971): Granted full statehood, distinct from its earlier status as a UT/Category C state.

📊 Fact Spotlight

State	Year of Statehood	Former Status
Andhra	1953	Part of Madras State
Nagaland	1963	Tribal Territory
Himachal Pradesh	1971	Union Territory
Meghalaya	1972	Sub-state (within Assam)

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Memorable Trivia: 1972 was a pivotal year for the Northeast, seeing statehood for Manipur, Tripura, and Meghalaya. This helps distinguish it from the 1971 statehood of Himachal Pradesh.

MEDIUM

Consider the following statements regarding the 35th Constitutional Amendment (1974) related to the integration of Sikkim:

It conferred the status of an 'Associate State' (Sahayak Rajya) upon Sikkim.
It introduced Article 2A and the 10th Schedule to the Indian Constitution.
Representatives of Sikkim as an Associate State were permitted to participate in the Presidential elections.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 and 2 only

2 and 3 only

1 and 3 only

1, 2 and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1 and 2 only.
Core Concept: The 35th Amendment (1974) designated Sikkim as an Associate State, inserting Article 2A and the 10th Schedule. However, representatives could not vote in Presidential elections.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The 35th Amendment (1974):
- Associate Status: This amendment provided a bridge between 'Protectorate' and 'Full State' status, granting representation in both houses of Parliament.
- Exclusion of Rights: Crucially, the representatives were explicitly barred from participating in Presidential elections, highlighting a limited federal status.
- Administrative Integration: This phase allowed citizens to access Indian Administrative Services and higher education, fostering integration into the Indian mainstream.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Constitutional Amendment	Year	Key Outcome for Sikkim
35th Amendment	1974	Created 'Associate State' status and added Article 2A/10th Schedule.
36th Amendment	1975	Established 'Full State' status and repealed Article 2A/10th Schedule.
Article 371F	1975	Added special protections for Sikkim's land and culture via 36th Amendment.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Common Trap: Students often confuse the 35th and 36th amendments. Remember: 35 is Associate (limited), 36 is Full (complete).

EASY

Which of the following components constitutes the 'Territory of India' as defined under the Constitution?

Only States and Union Territories

States, Union Territories, and any acquired territories

Only Indian States and foreign territories currently under lease

States and Union Territories only, as defined in Article 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is States, Union Territories, and any acquired territories.
Core Concept: The term 'Territory of India' is broader than the 'Union of India'.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Definition Breakdown:
- States: The constituent units of the federal structure.
- Union Territories: Administered directly by the Central Government.
- Acquired Territories: Any territory that India may acquire in the future (e.g., through international law or treaties).
Significance: This categorization ensures that India can expand its sovereign reach legally without needing to redefine the state structure immediately.

MEDIUM

According to Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, how does the Indian constitutional structure adapt to different national circumstances?

It functions as a 'Union' during peacetime and 'Federal' during emergencies.

It functions as a 'Federal' system during peacetime and a 'Union' during emergencies.

It functions as a 'Unitary' system regardless of the situation.

It functions as a 'Federal' system regardless of the situation.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: It functions as a 'Federal' system during peacetime and a 'Union' during emergencies.
Core Concept: Dynamic Federalism.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Peacetime: The structure respects the distribution of powers, maintaining federal character.
Emergency: The Constitution grants the Center overriding powers (e.g., during President's Rule or National Emergency), shifting the balance toward a strong, centralized Union to protect sovereignty.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Exam Trap: Always note the order of operations. During emergencies, power concentrates at the Center, hence 'Union' (Unitary-like) behavior.

EASY

Which of the following territories was liberated from French colonial control in 1954?

Goa

Daman

Pondicherry

Dadra and Nagar Haveli

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: Pondicherry.
Core Concept: Distinction between former French and Portuguese colonies.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

French Settlements: Included Pondicherry, Chandannagar, Yanam, Karaikal, and Mahe (liberated 1954).
Portuguese Settlements: Included Dadra and Nagar Haveli (liberated 1954), and Goa, Daman, and Diu (liberated 1961).

📊 Fact Spotlight

Colonial Power	Territories liberated in 1954
French	Pondicherry, Chandannagar, Yanam, Karaikal, Mahe
Portuguese	Dadra and Nagar Haveli

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Quick Check: It is vital to separate French vs Portuguese colonies as they often appear together in distractors.

MEDIUM

Match the following historical naming changes with the years they occurred:

Event	Year
A. United Provinces to Uttar Pradesh	1. 1950
B. Madras to Tamil Nadu	2. 1969
C. Mysore to Karnataka	3. 1973
D. Delhi to National Capital Territory of Delhi	4. 1992

Select the correct matching code:

A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4

A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3

A-1, B-3, C-2, D-4

A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
Core Concept: Chronology of major state and territory renamings.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Timeline Key:
- 1950: Transition from the colonial-era 'United Provinces' to Uttar Pradesh.
- 1969: The state of Madras was renamed Tamil Nadu.
- 1973: The state of Mysore adopted the name Karnataka.
- 1992: The Union Territory of Delhi attained the official status and name National Capital Territory of Delhi.

EASY

Match the method of integration with the corresponding Princely State:

Princely State	Method of Integration
A. Jammu & Kashmir	1. Operation Polo (Police Action)
B. Junagadh	2. Instrument of Accession
C. Hyderabad	3. Plebiscite (Janmat Sangrah)

Select the correct code from the options below:

A-2, B-3, C-1

A-3, B-2, C-1

A-2, B-1, C-3

A-1, B-3, C-2

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct match is A-2, B-3, C-1.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Methodologies:
- Jammu & Kashmir: Utilized the Instrument of Accession (Viley Patra).
- Junagadh: Public sentiment was gauged through a Plebiscite (Janmat Sangrah).
- Hyderabad: Required military-led police action known as Operation Polo.

Free Forever

Track Your Progress

You're Doing Great! 🎯

Unlimited PYQs Progress Tracking Mock Tests

✨ Free forever • No credit card • 2 sec signup with Google

Full Mock Tests

Take Full-Length Mock Tests

Test your complete preparation with timed mock tests. Get detailed analytics and compare scores with other aspirants.

Explore Test Series

All Chapters

Indian Polity

Salient Features of Constitution

55+ questions

Making of Constitution

132+ questions

Preamble & Schedules

222+ questions

Union & Its Territories

Directive Principles of State Policy

Centre-State Relations

264+ questions

Constitutional Amendments

Important Commissions

121+ questions

Socio-Political Dynamics

100+ questions

Political Parties

135+ questions

Civil Society & Movements

187+ questions

Local Self-Government

186+ questions