History of Rajasthan

British Supremacy in the State

50,000+ Questions

Previous Year Papers

Detailed Solutions

Hindi & English

JEN (Diploma) 21.8.2018

MEDIUM

When did Governor General Bentinck organize a court (Darbar) of native kings in Ajmer?

1832 AD

1834 AD

1829 AD

1830 AD

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1832 AD.
Core Concept: The Ajmer Darbar of 1832 was a high-level diplomatic assembly organized by Lord William Bentinck to consolidate British influence and establish a friendly rapport with the Rajput rulers of Rajasthan.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The Core Entity: Ajmer Darbar (1832):
- Organized on January 17, 1832, in Ajmer, which served as the British administrative center in Rajasthan.
- It was a strategic move to showcase British Paramountcy while adhering to Bentinck's general policy of Non-Intervention and Non-Aggression.
Why It is Correct:
- Historical records and contemporary Kota paintings explicitly document the gathering of native kings with the Governor-General in 1832.
- The event was designed to ensure the loyalty of the Rajput states during a period of administrative transition in British India.

📊 Fact Spotlight: The 1832 Ajmer Darbar

Attribute	Detail	Significance
Key Organizer	Lord William Bentinck	First Governor-General to implement a broad non-interference policy with native states.
Major Participants	Maharana Jawan Singh (Udaipur), Sawai Jai Singh (Jaipur), Maharao Ram Singh (Kota), Nawab Amir Khan (Tonk)	Represented the most powerful political entities of Rajputana.
Historical Record	Kota School of Painting	The event is immortalized in large-scale cloth paintings and murals, showing the grandeur of the royal elephants and tents.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Common Pitfall / Exam Trap: Students often confuse the policies of different Governor-Generals. Remember that Lord William Bentinck followed a policy of Non-Intervention (interfering only in cases of extreme misgovernment), whereas Lord Dalhousie (later) followed the aggressive Doctrine of Lapse to annex states.

Memorable Trivia: The Ajmer Darbar is a favorite topic for art historians because of the Kota paintings. These artworks provide a visual record of the 1832 event, depicting Maharao Ram Singh of Kota entertaining Bentinck with immense luxury, including the use of the tallest howdahs on the largest elephants to signal status.

EASY

In the context of the Bundi succession crisis of 1821, what specific title was assigned to Colonel James Tod?

Political Agent

Guardian (Samrakshak)

Resident Commissioner

Superintendent of Revenue

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is Guardian (Samrakshak).
Core Concept: Specific designation in British-controlled Princely States.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Role Analysis:
- When a ruler was a minor, the British often appointed a Guardian (Samrakshak) to manage the state's affairs until the ruler reached adulthood.
- James Tod assumed this specific role for Ram Singh in Bundi.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Term	Meaning
Samrakshak	Guardian / Protector (Hindi/Regional term used in administration)

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Vocabulary Note: RPSC papers often use the Hindi term (Samrakshak) in brackets to ensure clarity, as administrative designations vary by region.

MEDIUM

Assertion (A): The Rajputana Agency was established in Ajmer in 1832 for the purpose of centralizing control.
Reason (R): Ajmer was a central location that allowed the British to effectively manage the princely states of Rajputana.

Choose the correct option:

Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A

Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A

A is true but R is false

A is false but R is true

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
Core Concept: Rationale for administrative geography.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Reasoning:
- The British needed a central nerve center to administer the various Rajput states.
- Ajmer was chosen as the location for the Rajputana Agency in 1832 specifically because it served as a strategic nexus for overseeing political and administrative affairs across the region.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Administrative Node	Significance in British Raj
Ajmer	Strategic Central Node; Site of Agency formation (1832)
Mount Abu	Climatic/Administrative Summer HQ (Post-1845)

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Logic Check: Always analyze if the 'Reason' explains the 'Why' of the 'Assertion'. Here, the need to 'centralize control' directly justifies the selection of a central headquarters site.

HARD

Assertion (A): The Policy of Subordinate Isolation required that states pay the tribute (Khiraj) to the British East India Company that they previously paid to the Marathas.

Reason (R): This policy aimed to replace Maratha influence and establish the Company as the supreme power in India.

Which of the following is correct?

Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).

Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).

(A) is true, but (R) is false.

(A) is false, but (R) is true.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Logic: The redirection of the tribute was not merely a financial transaction but a calculated political maneuver. By redirecting the Khiraj to the British, the Company effectively usurped the Marathas' position as the overlords of the Rajput states, thereby cementing the Company's claim to being the Supreme Power in India.

MEDIUM

Consider the following statements regarding the 1818 Treaty between the British Company and Jodhpur State:

The treaty was officially signed on 6 January 1818.
Charles Metcalfe signed the treaty representing the British Governor-General.
The treaty was signed on behalf of Maharaja Man Singh by Crown Prince Chhatr Singh, Vyas Vishanram, and Vyas Abhayram.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Only 1 and 2

Only 2 and 3

Only 1 and 3

1, 2, and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: All three statements are correct.
Core Concept: The 1818 Treaty established formal diplomatic and financial ties between the British East India Company and the Kingdom of Jodhpur.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Historical Context: In the early 19th century, the British aggressively expanded their influence over Rajputana states through subsidiary alliances. Charles Metcalfe was the primary architect of these treaties.
Signatories: The document was a formal agreement requiring authorization from both the British Governor-General's office and the Jodhpur Durbar. The inclusion of the Crown Prince and senior administrative officials (Vyas clan) indicates the high-level endorsement by Maharaja Man Singh.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Common Pitfall: Students often confuse the signatories. Remember that Metcalfe represented the British, while the Vyas family members (Vishanram and Abhayram) were influential administrators who represented the Jodhpur throne.

Memorable Trivia: This treaty effectively ended the Maratha (Sindhia) suzerainty over Jodhpur, shifting the tribute obligations permanently to the British.

No credit card required

HARD

Consider the following statements regarding the financial and military obligations under the 1823 Treaty of Sirohi:

The Sirohi state was granted a three-year exemption from paying any tribute (Khiraj) to the British.
Taxes and customs duties in Sirohi could be levied solely at the ruler's discretion to support the local economy.
The British had the explicit right to station their army within the territory of Sirohi.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Only 1 and 2

Only 2 and 3

Only 1 and 3

1, 2, and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is Only 1 and 3.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Taxation Clause: Statement 2 is incorrect. The treaty stipulated that taxes and customs duties were to be levied according to the instructions of British officials for the sake of trade and public interest, not at the sole discretion of the ruler.

HARD

What was the chronological sequence of the following events leading to the Jhalawar treaty?

Formation of the independent state of Jhalawar.
Death of Zala Zalim Singh.
Political Agent Ludlow's suggestion to repeal clauses.
Succession of Madho Singh and Madan Singh.

2 -> 4 -> 3 -> 1

4 -> 2 -> 3 -> 1

2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 1

3 -> 2 -> 4 -> 1

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: 2 -> 4 -> 3 -> 1.
Core Concept: Tracing the chain of events that led to the diplomatic and administrative decision of 1838.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Chronological Flow:
- First: Zala Zalim Singh dies.
- Second: His successors Madho Singh and Madan Singh take over.
- Third: Political friction causes Ludlow to intervene and suggest the repeal of the 1818 clauses.
- Fourth: The treaty is finalized, leading to the formation of Jhalawar.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Focus: Always remember that succession comes immediately after death, followed by the political 'agitation' or dispute that prompts the British intervention.

MEDIUM

Match the following rulers with the year of their documented diplomatic approach to the British:

Ruler	Year of Approach
A. Maharaja Prithvi Singh (Jaipur)	1. 1786
B. Maharaja Vijay Singh (Jodhpur)	2. 1795-96
C. Maharaja Pratap Singh (Jaipur)	3. 1776
D. Rulers of Jaipur, Kota, Jodhpur	4. 1781

Select the correct code from the options below:

A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2

A-1, B-4, C-3, D-2

A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2

A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct matching is A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2.
Core Concept: These events constitute the pre-1818 diplomatic history of Rajasthan, where rulers acted independently to find solutions to the Maratha menace.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Chronology of Diplomacy:
- 1776: Prithvi Singh of Jaipur initiated contact.
- 1781: Vijay Singh of Jodhpur approached the British.
- 1786: Pratap Singh of Jaipur attempted to establish a treaty.
- 1795-96: A collective push involving Jaipur, Kota, and Jodhpur took place.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Event / Entity	Significance in Rajasthan History
Maratha Menace	Forced various states to seek British help, highlighting the lack of unity among Rajput states.
British EIC	Remained passive during this period, prioritizing trade and consolidated revenue over territorial expansion in Rajasthan.
Pre-1818 Phase	A period of significant political insecurity for native states of Rajasthan.

EASY

Who mediated the treaty signed between the Banswara state and the British Company on 25 December 1818?

Charles Metcalfe

John Malcolm

George Lawrence

Lord Hastings

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: John Malcolm.
Core Concept: Diplomatic mediation in Rajputana states.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The Mediator's Role:
- John Malcolm was a key British official responsible for negotiating treaties with various Rajputana states.
- He served as a crucial bridge between local rulers like Ummed Singh and the British East India Company to consolidate control in the region.

MEDIUM

The tribute (Khiraj) that was exempted for Karauli under the Treaty of 1817 was previously paid to which entity?

The Mughal Emperor

The British East India Company (in Bengal)

The Peshwa

The Holkars of Indore

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The Peshwa.
Core Concept: Historical political realignment in Rajputana.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Historical Context: Prior to the British consolidation in 1817-1818, the Maratha influence, specifically the Peshwa, held significant power and collected tribute (Khiraj) from many Rajput states.
Policy Shift: The British policy was to neutralize Maratha influence by replacing their claims (like tribute) with British treaties, effectively transferring the political suzerainty.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Entity	Role in Rajputana (Pre-1817)
Peshwa	Primary tribute collector (Maratha Confederacy)
British Company	Emergent hegemon post-1817

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Memorable Trivia: The shift from 'Peshwa' to 'British' dependency is the defining feature of the transition in Rajputana during the early 19th century.

Full Mock Tests

Take Full-Length Mock Tests

Test your complete preparation with timed mock tests. Get detailed analytics and compare scores with other aspirants.

Explore Test Series

MEDIUM

Consider the following statements regarding British Political Agents and the 1857 Revolution in Rajasthan:

Major Burton, the Political Agent of Kota, was killed during the mass uprising on October 15, 1857.
Captain C.L. Showers served as the Political Agent in Udaipur during the 1857 revolution.
Mac Mason, the Political Agent of Jodhpur, was killed in the Battle of Chelawas.
William Eden was the Political Agent of Jaipur during the 1857 revolution.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 and 2 only

2 and 3 only

1, 2 and 3 only

1, 2, 3 and 4

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: All statements (1, 2, 3, and 4) are correct.
Core Concept: The British political hierarchy in Rajasthan utilized Political Agents to ensure state compliance; their deaths and actions during the 1857 revolt signify the peak of the defiance by revolutionary soldiers.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Agents and Revolts:
- Major Burton (Kota): Faced a total collapse of authority and was murdered with his sons.
- Mac Mason (Jodhpur): His death at the Battle of Chelawas became an iconic symbol of the defiance of Thakur Kushal Singh of Auwa.
- Showers (Udaipur): Functioned in Udaipur; Maharana Swaroop Singh of Udaipur sheltered British refugees, maintaining a loyal stance.
- Eden (Jaipur): Faced pressure to declare anti-British officials outlaws, though Maharaja Ram Singh II remained loyal.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Agent	State	Outcome/Event
Burton	Kota	Killed in Oct 1857
Mac Mason	Jodhpur	Killed in Sep 1857 (Chelawas)
Showers	Udaipur	Remained in power/loyal state
Nixon	Bharatpur	Political Agent ( Bharatpur/Dholpur)

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Exam Trap: Remember that while Political Agents were murdered in Kota and the Battle of Chelawas, many states like Jaipur and Udaipur remained officially loyal, protecting the Political Agents stationed there.

MEDIUM

Regarding the causes of the 1857 Revolt in Rajasthan, which of the following is cited as a significant factor for public and Samant discontent?

Excessive taxation and the interference in social and religious life through Christian missionary propaganda.

The British ban on the construction of temples in the region.

The complete abolition of all taxes across the Rajputana states by the British.

The forced relocation of all feudal lords to Ajmer.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is Excessive taxation and the interference in social and religious life through Christian missionary propaganda.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Social Discontent: Discontent wasn't limited to the political sphere. The spread of Western education, Western institutions, and Christian missionary propaganda created a deep-seated fear among the public and the nobility that their traditional culture and religious identity were under attack by the British authorities.

MEDIUM

Which of the following is NOT true regarding the Treaty of 1838?

It was signed on 10 April 1838.

It effectively ended the supplementary clauses of the 1818 treaty.

It resulted in the amalgamation of Jhalawar into Kota.

Madan Singh was appointed as the ruler of the new state.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: It resulted in the amalgamation of Jhalawar into Kota.
Core Concept: Identifying the process of state formation correctly.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The Truth: The treaty was specifically about the separation of Jhalawar from Kota, not amalgamation. It created an independent state for the descendants of Zalim Singh.
Verification: The 1838 treaty was a separation treaty, making Jhalawar independent of Kota's previous administration.

MEDIUM

Arrange the following events in chronological order:

Treaty with Jhalawar
Establishment of the Rajputana Residency (Ajmer)
Treaty with Bikaner
Treaty with Jodhpur

Select the correct sequence from the options below:

4, 3, 2, 1

3, 4, 1, 2

4, 2, 3, 1

3, 2, 4, 1

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct order is 4 (1818) -> 3 (1818) -> 2 (1832) -> 1 (1838).
Correct Sequence:
- Jodhpur Treaty: January 6, 1818.
- Bikaner Treaty: March 21, 1818.
- Rajputana Residency: 1832.
- Jhalawar Treaty: April 10, 1838.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Chronology:
- The initial wave of treaties (1817-1819) focused on ending Maratha/Pindari influence.
- The Rajputana Residency (1832) centralized British administration in Ajmer.
- Jhalawar (1838) was the last major territorial adjustment by splitting Kota.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Event	Year	Context
Jodhpur Treaty	1818	Treaty date
Bikaner Treaty	1818	Treaty date
Residency	1832	Administrative centralization
Jhalawar Treaty	1838	State separation

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Memorable Trivia: Jhalawar is historically noted as the last princely state created in the Rajasthan region during the British era.

HARD

Regarding the number of parganas separated from the Kota State to form Jhalawar, which of the following is accurate based on the historical context provided?

Exactly 10, as per standard British records.

Precisely 25, as mentioned by all historians.

17, though Dr. M.L. Sharma notes 19.

Always 19, with no other conflicting historical counts.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: 17, though Dr. M.L. Sharma notes 19.
Core Concept: Historical ambiguity in administrative records of the 19th-century princely states.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The Discrepancy: While records typically cite 17 parganas being detached from the Kota state, prominent historian Dr. M.L. Sharma documents the figure as 19. Exams often test this specific historiographical nuance.
Pargana Significance: Parganas were administrative units. Examples of these included Chechat, Suket, Aver, Dag, and Gangrad.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Exam Trap: If a question asks for the number of parganas, prioritize the standard range provided in your study text (17 to 19). If both numbers appear in the options, choose the answer that acknowledges both the primary count (17) and the scholar's count (19).

HARD

Match the following states with the specific month and year their treaty was signed with the British:

State	Date of Treaty
A. Kishangarh	1. 25 December 1818
B. Banswara	2. 10 February 1818
C. Bundi	3. 07 April 1818
D. Pratapgarh	4. 05 October 1818

Select the correct code:

A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4

A-2, B-1, C-3, D-4

A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2

A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct matching is A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Timeline Analysis:
- Kishangarh: Signed early in the second quarter of 1818, specifically 07 April 1818.
- Banswara: One of the final treaties of 1818, signed on 25 December 1818.
- Bundi: Followed the major early 1818 treaties on 10 February 1818.
- Pratapgarh: Signed in the autumn of 1818 on 05 October 1818.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Common Trap: Many students confuse the order of late 1818 treaties. Remember: Pratapgarh (Oct) -> Dungarpur (Dec 11) -> Banswara (Dec 25).

MEDIUM

Consider the following statements regarding the factors that compelled Rajput rulers to seek alliances with the British:

The persistent greed of the Marathas and the collection of 'Chauth' caused economic strain on Rajput states.
The internal governance was weakened by the growing rebellious attitude of feudal lords known as Samants.
Pindari gangs provided military assistance to Rajput states against the Marathas.
Rajput rulers viewed the British treaties as a protective measure to stabilize their treasury and internal administration.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1, 2, and 3

1, 2, and 4

2, 3, and 4

All of the above

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1, 2, and 4.
Core Concept: Rajput states sought British protection primarily due to the Triple Threat: Maratha hegemony, Pindari plunder, and internal administrative instability.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

The Reality of Alliances:
- Maratha Influence: The Marathas were not allies but extractors of wealth through the Chauth tax, which drained the Rajput coffers.
- Internal Instability: The Samants (feudal lords) were often at odds with the rulers, creating a power vacuum or internal rebellions that made centralized governance impossible.
- Pindari Plunder: Pindaris were organized gangs of marauders. They were the opposite of military allies; they were sources of chaos, engaging in unchecked looting that terrorized the public.
Why It is Correct:
- Statements 1, 2, and 4 accurately describe the historical reality of the early 19th-century Rajasthan political climate.
- Statement 3 is incorrect because Pindaris were a menace that the states sought to escape from, not a source of assistance.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Factor Type	Specific Detail	Consequence for Rajput States
External Tax	Maratha Chauth	Economic bankruptcy
Internal Faction	Rebellious Samants	Administrative instability
External Banditry	Pindari Raids	Loss of public safety and revenue
Diplomatic Shift	British Treaties	Loss of sovereignty for protection

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Common Pitfall: Do not confuse the Maratha policy of Chauth with a legitimate administrative tax; it was essentially extortionate tribute. Also, remember that Pindaris were independent looters, not a recognized state army.

HARD

Assertion (A): Zala Zalim Singh's death was a turning point for the administrative structure of the Kota-Jhalawar region.
Reason (R): His successors lacked the ability to manage the state, forcing the British to take over immediately.

Which of the following is correct?

Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

A is true, but R is false.

A is false, but R is true.

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: A is true, but R is false.
Core Concept: Analyzing the political triggers of the 1838 Treaty.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Why A is True: Zalim Singh's death left a succession vacuum where his successors (Madho Singh and Madan Singh) stepped in, but the existing treaty clauses (from 1818) made their position and their relation to the Kota Maharao highly contested.
Why R is False: The British did not take over the state because the successors were 'incapable.' Rather, they intervened to resolve a complex, long-standing legal and administrative conflict regarding the interpretation of the 1818 supplementary clauses.

HARD

Consider the following statements regarding the Treaty of Jaisalmer (1819):

The Jaisalmer State accepted British suzerainty to stabilize the internal administration.
The state was exempted from paying Khiraj (tribute) to the British.
The exemption from tribute was granted because Jaisalmer had been a loyal tributary of the Marathas for decades.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 and 2 only

2 and 3 only

1 and 3 only

1, 2, and 3

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: The correct answer is 1 and 2 only.
Core Concept: Understanding the diplomatic and economic nuances of the 1819 treaty.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Statement 1 (Correct): Mulraj signed the treaty specifically to curb internal discord and restore governance.
Statement 2 (Correct): Jaisalmer was indeed unique in being exempted from the standard Khiraj payment.
Statement 3 (Incorrect): The exemption was granted precisely because Jaisalmer had never paid tribute to the Marathas; the premise that it was a loyal Maratha tributary is false.

💡 Exam Strategy & Trivia

Tip

Common Pitfall: Be careful with statements that sound logical but flip the historical fact. Jaisalmer's tribute exemption is a classic 'exception to the rule' test point.

MEDIUM

Match the following historical elements related to the 1818 Banswara treaty:

Element	Description
A. Maharawal	1. Previous recipient of tribute
B. John Malcolm	2. Ruler of Banswara in 1818
C. Khiraj	3. Mediator of the treaty
D. Dhar State	4. Term for the tribute paid by Banswara

Select the correct code from the options below:

A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1

A-1, B-3, C-4, D-2

A-2, B-4, C-3, D-1

A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4

Explanation

🌟 Quick Verification

Direct Answer: A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1.
Core Concept: Understanding the key figures, terminology, and financial shifts within the Banswara treaty.

🧠 Concept Blueprint

Matching Logic:
- Maharawal refers to Ummed Singh, the ruler during the 1818 treaty.
- John Malcolm served as the British mediator.
- Khiraj is the technical term for the tribute Banswara paid to the British, which was previously diverted to the Dhar state.

📊 Fact Spotlight

Figure/Term	Role/Definition	Significance
Ummed Singh	Maharawal	Negotiated for British protection
John Malcolm	Diplomat	Facilitated treaties across Rajputana
Khiraj	Tribute	Re-routed from Dhar to British Company

Free Forever

Track Your Progress

You're Doing Great! 🎯

Unlimited PYQs Progress Tracking Mock Tests

✨ Free forever • No credit card • 2 sec signup with Google

Full Mock Tests

Take Full-Length Mock Tests

Test your complete preparation with timed mock tests. Get detailed analytics and compare scores with other aspirants.

Explore Test Series

All Chapters

History of Rajasthan

Sources of Rajasthan History

97+ questions

Ancient Civilizations and Archaeological Sites

169+ questions

Janapada and Ancient Names

32+ questions

Origin of Rajputs

98+ questions

Gurjara-Pratihara Dynasty

Other Dynasties of Rajasthan

59+ questions

Medieval Rajasthan: Administration and Revenue System

Social and Political Organizations

81+ questions

Newspapers

74+ questions

Archaeological Sources

Medieval Administrative and Revenue System

405+ questions

British Supremacy in the State

Political Integration

292+ questions

Freedom Fighters

806+ questions

Language and Literature